Sabah, Malaysia

Sabah

Different crop, different continent. The same question about what counts as a trustworthy record.

  1. Farmer IDissued in the pilot
  2. Trade recordover USSD
  3. Escrow paymentreleased on delivery
  4. Crop movement
A record built on a feature phone

01Context

Hill-paddy farmers in Sabah grow and trade rice across remote terrain, often with limited connectivity and basic phones.

Their sales, payments and crop movement are real, but rarely recorded in a way farmers can use to prove their history.

02What I initially thought

I expected that the AXK approach could be carried over directly: the same record, a different crop.

03What changed

The fields carried over; the interface didn't. On feature phones over USSD, every step had to be short, forgiving and understandable without a screen full of context.

Identity turned out to be the hardest field. A record is only as useful as the confidence that it belongs to the right farmer, so identity issuance became part of the pilot itself.

04What I built

A hill-paddy pilot combining USSD access, identity issuance for farmers and escrow payments, so that a sale, its payment and the movement of the crop could be tied to the same person.

The partnership with UNDP Malaysia is documented in UNDP's New Tech, New Partners (2026), page 92.

05Evidence

1,000
farmers onboarded
≈ $500K
in rice volume

Independently checkable references

  1. UNDP — New Tech, New Partners (p. 92) Documents the technology partnership and development work with UNDP Malaysia behind the Sabah pilot.

06What I learned

The question travels, but the constraints don't. Representation has to be designed around the conditions in which evidence is actually produced.

07Back to the question

Sabah confirmed that the problem wasn't specific to East African trade. It is a general problem of turning informal activity into durable records.